Photo: STR/Reuters /Landov
Prisoners at Halden in Norway have private rooms, which all have a fridge, desk and flat-screen TV. Inmates who don’t follow the rules and attend classes and counseling are sent to conventional prisons. NPR story here.
A perhaps surprising finding: In Norway, spending time in prison, where there are intensive job-training opportunities, results in 27 percent less recidivism than being sentenced to something lighter, like community service or probation.
As reported last summer in Science Newsline, “The research project ‘The Social Costs of Incarceration’ is the largest study of imprisonment and return to a normal life that has ever been conducted in Europe.
“In the study, researchers looked at prison sentences linked to recidivism. In addition, the researchers looked at the extent to which former inmates have returned to work. What makes the project unique is linking large administrative data sets to data sets from the courts.
“They have done this to measure the effect of what happens when the criminals have received different penalties for the same offense because they randomly met different judges in court with different leniency towards incarcerating. In other words: if a judge incarcerates differently for the same offense, what will be the consequences for the offender in the long term?
” ‘The results show that the Norwegian prison model with extensive use of labour training while serving time, gives surprisingly good results,’ says Professor Katrine Løken at the Department of Economics, University of Bergen (UiB), who led the research project.
“The study shows: Five years after conviction, there is a 27 per cent lower risk that convicts who have been in prison have committed new crimes, compared to those who were given more lenient penalties, like probation and community service. For the 60 per cent of inmates who had not been employed for the last five years preceding the conviction, the decline in criminal activity is even bigger. … The study is published as a Working Paper in Economics at the University of Bergen.”
Løken doesn’t necessarily think the answer is sending more people to prison; providing more job training outside of prison might be.
” ‘A relevant question is whether we should aim for full package of job-training outside prison. But research shows that work training outside of prison is more difficult to enforce. It appears that a certain element of coercion is needed to get offenders on a new track.’
“Katrine Løken stresses that the research does not take a stand on the principle of imprisonment, but simply says something about how prison is perceived for the individual, and shows the effects of different sentencing.”
Many studies show that incarceration in the United States leads to more crime, not less. Different kinds of prisons, for sure.
More here.
All I could think, while I read this, is what conservatives around here would say about convicts getting free education while “good” people have to borrow money to go to college! But this program makes such sense to me, and the idea that they have to go to a traditional prison if they don’t take full advantage makes sense, too . . .
“Good” people shouldn’t have to borrow as much money as they do now. It’s tragic that the country doesn’t support education more.
Thank you for posting the link to this article on my blog, S’s Mom!
🙂
The Nordics come up as an example set quite often in my work on Project Do Better.
I’ll be happy to post a link here, if you’d like.
Warmly,
Shira
Sure. Please do!
Here’s my main explanatory page for the project:
https://shiradest.wordpress.com/pubs-workshops-and-more/
Shira